First off: LAST BLOG! FOREVER! Now that that’s out of the way, here is my actual post. This week we only read one scene, so this will probably be short.
Act V, Scene I
So the main drift of this scene was Bottom and co. performing their play about Pyramus and Thisbe and for the most part being mocked by the couples. But before that, there was an interesting quote from Theseus. As I mentioned in previous blogs, Theseus is the exact opposite of everything else that has been going on in the play: logical, down to earth, and sensible. Here is the quote:
More strange than true. I never may believe
These antique fables nor these fairy toys.
Lovers and madmen have such seething brains,
Such shaping fantasies, that apprehend
More than cool reason ever comprehends.
The lunatic, the lover, and the poet
Are of imagination all compact.
One sees more devils than vast hell can hold—
That is the madman. The lover, all as frantic,
Sees Helen’s beauty in a brow of Egypt.
The poet’s eye, in fine frenzy rolling,
Doth glance from heaven to Earth, from Earth to heaven.
And as imagination bodies forth
The forms of things unknown, the poet’s pen
Turns them to shapes and gives to airy nothing
A local habitation and a name.
Such tricks hath strong imagination,
That if it would but apprehend some joy,
It comprehends some bringer of that joy.
Or in the night, imagining some fear,
How easy is a bush supposed a bear!
(By the way, I don’t know why the quote is double spaced. Sorry! The blog hates me.)
Back to the discussion. Basically this quote is talking about how Theseus thinks that lunatics, lovers, madmen, and poets are all the same – they hallucinate, have overactive imaginations, and say crazy things. But if Theseus is in love, isn’t he calling himself crazy? Anyway, I was wondering what you all thought of this quote. Is there any truth to it, considering what has happened in the play? Also, how does this quote sum up the play in general? (Sorry if that question is a little confusing.) That’s really all I could find to write about for this post, unless you guys want to talk about all the grammatical errors made in the “play” the actors put on…
I’d also like you to think about the play as a whole. Not specific details out of the plot, but how the acts fit together. To put it simply, how is the play structured? (Which act is the climax, etc. And do NOT just say that there are five acts with scenes.) Also, how does the overall structure of the play contribute to its being put into the “comedy” category? (That question might be confusing too.)
Recap:
- What did you think about Theseus’ quote?
- Is there any truth to the quote, considering what happened in the play?
- How does this quote sum up the play in general?
- How is the play structured?
- How does the overall structure of the play contribute to its being put into the “comedy” category?
- What did you think of the play?
And that concludes my final blog.
Erin B