Category: Discussion Director


House of Sand and Fog, Period 1, Kortney Mann D.D., Post 2

April 3rd, 2009 — 04:37 pm

Ok from the last time we read up until the end of section 1 we learn that Kathy went to talk to Behrani’s wife. He comes home to find them talking. He yells at he to never come back and that he’s knows about her friend that came to their house pretending to be a cop. Which brings me back to before this, Lester develops a plan to go to Behrani’s home and scare them into moving out of the house so Kathy can have it back.

After this incident Kathy tries to kill herself, but Behrani finds her and stops her. HE takes her to his home and let’s her sleep. Now after all that has happened he is starting to understand and feel sorry for Kathy.

We also find out that Kathy finally decided to call her brother and tell him about what has happend.

Throughout this section we see many of the characters change:

Kathy: She seems to become more depressed because of the whole situation.

 Lester: He goes from being the one who evicted her to the one who is falling in love with her.

Behrani: He doesn’t like Kathy at first but then after those events happen he sympathizes for her.

Behrani’s wife: At the beginning she seems very distant from her husband, but now she seems closer to him, maybe because of Kathy.

 

Questions:

1.    Do you think it was right for Lester to pretend to be a cop and go to Behrani’s home?

2.    Is it reasonable for Lester to be possibly falling in love with Kathy?

3.    Do you think Behrani’s actions when he came home to find Kathy talking with his wife were appropriate?

2 comments » | Discussion Director

The Memory Keepers Daughter – Derrick Truax – DD post 1

March 22nd, 2009 — 02:07 pm

Well, this is really late, but I was having some book troubles. Here are some questions to get some discussion going.

Do you guys think Dr. David Henry is a bad person and husband for having Phoebe taken away? Does the fact that he was trying to protect his wife  make him okay?

Also, do you guys think Caroline made the right decision to keep Phoebe out of the institution.

Finally, why is it that Norah is so obsessed with the dead baby that she never even knew,  especially since she still has one child?

3 comments » | Discussion Director, Per 1 WH DD

All the Pretty Horses- Abbey Stefanides- DD

March 20th, 2009 — 10:33 pm

I think that this book is a really good book! I am really liking it! I appologize for posting so close to the deadline.

In Part I, John Grady leaves Texas to go and escape to Mexico. He has many troubles with his mother, and his father is pretty ill. Then he finds out that his parents are actually divorced, and that his mother is going to sell the ranch that John loves so much. This is when John meets up with his buddy Rawlins and they start their trip. They then meet Bevlins. He seems skeptical at first, but then the boys gain up enough trust to incorporate him into their group. Throught the first part, the boys overcome some obstacles. I have an opening question for you to start off, and then tomorrow I will post a comment with a couple more questions on it.

My question:

Would you have handled any of the obstacles differntly? If you would, what would you have done? Why?

(Would you have made a “different turn” that would change the outcome of the situation?)

7 comments » | Discussion Director, Uncategorized

The Great Gatsby, Post 1, Pd. 1, Discussion Director

March 20th, 2009 — 10:04 pm

Be prepared to read a very long post!  I know that we only read two chapters so far, but I’ve found a lot of things to discuss.  Plus, if you’ve read any of my other posts/comments you know that I write long, rambling, and confusing things. :)

To start I’d like to talk about a few things on the first page.  One thing in particular is the very first quotation in the novel.  The quote is, “Whenever you feel like criticizing anyone just remember that all the people in this world haven’t had the advantages that you’ve had.”  I think this is quite obvious to figure out – hold your tongue.  But that’s not why I’m bringing it up.  Instead I’d like to talk about how this relates to Fitzgerald’s introduction to the narrator, Nick Carraway.  There are significant parts to this quote.  The first issue it brings up is Nick’s moral values.  He has always been taught not to judge which makes him very different from the rest of the characters in the book.  For example, Tom blatantly states that he is a racist in the first chapter when he says, “It’s up to us who are the dominant race to watch out or these other races will have control of things.”  (He’s speaking about the book The Rise of the Colored Empire which I find particularly funny.)  These moral values of Nick leads the reader to trust what he says and therefore makes him a reliable narrator.  This one quote gave us all that insight into Nick.  Can you find any other deep and/or revealing quotes in the text?  Explain how they give us insight to Nick’s world.

The whole rest of my post is going to talk about Fitzgerald’s unique writing style.  This is probably what makes the book the most interesting for me.  One of the techniques Fitzgerald used is foreshadowing in the first chapter.  He writes, “…it is what preyed on Gatsby, what foul dust floated in the wake of his dreams that temporarily closed out my interest in the abortive sorrows and short-winded elations of men.”  This leads me to believe that Gatsby is in danger by someone or something.  What are your opinions about this? Does anyone have specific predictions?

Another intriguing item found in the novel was that the book itself is supposedly being written by Nick. Here’s the quote: “Only Gatsby, the man who gives his name to this book…”  Usually books are being told as if they are actually happening or being remembered, not the narrator writing a story about it.  Now why would Fitzgerald chose to have Nick writing down his experiences with Gatsby?  And Nick’s not even a writer – he’s in the “bond business”.  What do you think about this odd choice of perspective?

One thing that was very prominent in Fitzgerald’s writing is his use of oxymorons.  There are so many of them, both obviously placed and hidden subtly.  Here are some examples:

Pg. 1: He didn’t say any more but we’ve always been unusually communicative in a reserved way and I understood that he meant a great deal more than that.

Pg. 10 – 11: And so it happened that on a warm windy evening I drove over to East Egg to see two old friends whom I scarcely knew at all

Pg. 20: Among the broken fragments of the last five minutes at table I remember the candles being lit again, pointlessly, and I was conscious of wanting to look squarely at everyone and yet to avoid all eyes.

Pg. 23: I knew now why her face was familiar – its pleasing contemptuous expression had looked out at me from many rotogravure pictures of the sporting life at Asheville and Hot Springs and Palm Beach.

Pg. 40: I was within and without, simultaneously enchanted and repelled by the inexhaustible variety of life.

And those are just a few examples!  Why do you think that Fitzgerald uses so many oxymorons in his writing?  How does he use this technique via the characters?

And yes, there is still more.  As well as using oxymorons, Fitzgerald also likes to use ironic phrases/descriptions.  Here’s one for you: “So Tom Buchanan and his girl and I went up together to New York – or not quite together, for Mrs. Wilson sat discreetly in another car.  Tom deferred that much to the sensibilities of those East Eggers who might be on our train.”  How is this section ironic?  How does Fitzgerald use irony when describing the characters?

This is the last part, I promise.  The thing I’d like to discuss is how Fitzgerald introduces each character. When Nick is telling the reader about a new person he has met he tends to lean towards describing the physical traits rather than their personality.  But in a way, the properties being described give the reader an insight into what the character is really like.  I know how the two correlate. Do you?  Choose one character and explain how the physical attributes describe their personality as well.

Recap:

 

  1. Can you find any deep and/or revealing quotes in the text?  Explain how they give us insight to Nick’s world.  
  2. What are your opinions about Fitzgerald’s foreshadowing on pages 6 and 7? Do you have any ideas about what will happen to Gatsby?
  3. Why would Fitzgerald chose to have Nick writing down his experiences with Gatsby?  What do you think about this odd choice of perspective?
  4. Why do you think that Fitzgerald uses so many oxymorons in his writing?
  5. How does Fitzgerald use opposites via the characters? (How are the characters opposites?)  Name a set of characters and explain how they are completely contradictory.
  6. How is the quote about Nick, Tom, and Mrs. Wilson on the train ironic?
  7. How does Fitzgerald use irony when describing the characters?
  8. How do the physical characteristics of the characters seem to correlate to their personality?  Choose one character and explain how the physical attributes describe their personality as well.

Wow, that was long!  You guys just love having me in your group, don’t you?

Have fun!

Erin B. :)

P.S. – I think this blog deserves a little extra credit.  Don’t you?

5 comments » | Discussion Director

House of Sand and Fog, D.D., Kortney Mann, post 1

March 20th, 2009 — 06:43 pm

Sofar we have read about 2 main characters: Colonel Behrani and Kathy Nicolo.

Colonel Behrani: He was a once wealthy man, who is now nearly broke. He works two jobs, one as a freeway clean up worker, and another working in a convenient store. Even though he has little money, him, his wife, and his son still live in an upper class type house, just to keep up their appearance. He is not worried about his daughter because she is married into a good family. One day he takes off of work to go to a house action he saw in the paper. He goes prepared with a check to buy the house. Heout bids the other person at the auction and gets the house. When he goes home he tries to tell his wife about the hosue , but she doesn’t  want to listen to him. It seems like their relationship is a bit tense. He tells his son about the house, but he doesn’t seemed that happy either. He would rather stay there. After buying the house Behrani quits his job on the freeway.

Kathy Nicolo: So far we have learned that he husband has left her, and she is being evicted from her home. She inherited that house from her father, who has passes away. The house was already paid for, and she legally owned it, but the county officials are evicting her saying that she hasn’t been paying taxes from a home business. The thing is that her and her husband never had a home business, and she has already gone in and signed a paper stating that. She has also been throwing away mail from the county officials. In these letters it was telling her that her house was going up for auction. Now she is staying at a motel, and she has a lawyer who is trying to get her house back for her.

So far we have learned about these two people, but why they are both in this one story was unclear at first, until we learn that the house that the colonel bought is the house that Kathy got evicted from. Now this could happen to anyone, but the colonel did want to move into a more modest home until their financial state was secure.

Do you think that in anyway the colonel could have planned for Kathy to be evicted from her home so him and his family could move in?

Do you think that it is a coincidence that Kathy got evicted around the time when the colonel wanted to find a more reasonable home?

Do you think that the county’s choice was a fair choice to evict Kathy fro  her home?

Do you think that even with the colonel’s financial situation he should worry about what other people think of him, because it says that on his way home from the freeway cleanup he has to duck down so people from his building will not see him?

3 comments » | Discussion Director

Adam Lough, Anil’s Ghost- Discussion Director

March 20th, 2009 — 05:27 pm

Anil had a had a very different kind of life growing up. She was treated very strictly and had a regimented lifestyle. Even as an adult she seems cold and unmotivated.

So why is it that when she realized that the one body she found was murdered was she so intent on bringing the killer to justice?

Also, why is Anil so suspicious of Sarath?

He seems like he only wants to help her and hasn’t given her a reason to not trust him.
Adam Elizabeth Higgins Berkshire Lough

P.S. I wrote this blog after I came home from a long day of work and after a school sport and before i had to participate in the very time consuming and preplanned activities of my Friday night. Therefore i propose that the blogging dates should go until Saturday morning, there is hardly anything planned on then and they were much easier to do.  Thank you for your consideration.

Adam Lough

Edit-

Guys-still Tag your posts ROTN so that they are easier to find. Brian will tag everyone’s this time.

4 comments » | Discussion Director, Per 3 RotN DD

Dracula by Bram Stoker: Brandon Greer, Post 1, Discussion Director

March 20th, 2009 — 03:14 pm

Okay, before we get started with the actual blog, I have some reminders and comments for everyone. Remember, we keep our positions (discussion director, connector, etc.) for all four posts. We do not rotate. You should be reading the first 7 chapters for this post. Make sure you are not paying attention to when a diary entry, newspaper clipping, etc. ends in the book to determine when a chapter ends. Pay attention to the numbers!!! Now….Shank I have somethings I would like to say:

Posting on Friday is a pain in the butt. Everyone does it Saturday morning!!! It’s a TRADITION!!!

Now, on to Dracula:

1. When Jonathan is on his way to Dracula’s castle, he is warned not to go. However, they refuse to tell him why. He figures out that they are talking about werewolves and vampires. He also sees the coffin with Dracula in it and the way Dracula reacts when he (Jonathan) cuts himself and starts to bleed when he is shaving. Later on, he develops a serious fever. Do you think that Jonathan believes that Dracula is a vampire? Explain.

2. Bram Stoker never tells the story as a regular narrative. Instead, the story is told through an assortment of journal and diary entries, newspapers, etc. Why do you think he does this?

3. Compare and contrast the characters of Lucy and Mina.

Mr. Shank, if you can see when I last edited this, the last edit will be Sunday because I forgot to categorize it under Discussion Director. Otherwise, it was hard to find.

10 comments » | Discussion Director, Uncategorized

Discusion Director Brett Pallas Post 4

March 6th, 2009 — 09:30 pm

First off, to get a better look into the last few chapters we need to look into the past. Why do you guys think that Mr. Heathcliff married Isabell if he really loved Catherine? Could it be that he was using her? Possibly blackmail?

 

Why do you think that after all Mr. Heathcliff has done to Catherine, and vice/versa, that they once again meet each other? Do you think that Mr. Heathcliff intends to “woo” Catherine? Or possibly that maybe he wants just to get back at her?

 

Finally do you guys believe that what Mr. Heathcliff and Catherine is true love??? Being able to withstand the odds and everyone’s opionions! Or maybe its just a big crush. If you love somebody enough, dont you think you wouldn’t care what other people think of your relationship? Maybe Catherine and Mr. Heathcliff have a love/hate situation? They hate the fact that they love each other?

3 comments » | Discussion Director, Per 1 WH DD

The Bean Trees, Discussion Director, Period 1

March 6th, 2009 — 04:15 pm

So, this is our last blog for this book and then we are moving on to ‘The House of Sand and Fog’? We are going to have to discuss who will be doing which role for the first blog.

Taylor has gone through many things throughout the book. How has Taylor changed by the end of the book? Also, Taylor keeps in touch with her mother but still she does not seem to like her mothers’s new husband very much. Do you think Taylor will ever go back to see her mother? Why or why not? Estevan and Esperanza are illegal immigrants. With this as an issue today in our country, what do you think of the situation involving illegal immigrants? How should the United States deal with this in your opinion?

Have fun! :)

~Sarah Light

4 comments » | Discussion Director, per 1 TBT DD

TBT Discussion Director, Post 3

February 28th, 2009 — 02:36 pm

I feel that as much as Taylor cared about Turtle she wasn’t ready to face her about breaking her promise to Turtle about never letting anyone hurt her (pg.226) and yet she describes a feeling of hopelessness, not only about Turtle growing up in an environment that wasn’t expected for her ever since Taylor took to handling her or having to put up with things that are disconcerting to Turtle’s life that could have easily killed her but of the World in general. She used to feel that not all this malevolence was dispersible in the world she felt she knew so well. And yet, things were happening right in front of her eyes to which she was blind toward, but it’s as though she has opened her eyes and finally looked at this world that has turned itself full of arrogance, detestation and callous. She feels that this is not the world she knew, because she never really looked outside her community which may not have got along so well, but compared to the world is full of pacification.

When Turtle got hurt, did you expect Taylor to respond to this happening by acting as though her life was in excess of Turtle, or do you think she felt she had no possible control over Turtle being taken away from her?

I have told you Taylor’s views on the world, do yours differ, are they alike to Taylor’s view, or do you think that Taylor should just ignore the world that is surrounding her and live her life peacefully and try to find a way designated for Turtle to stay with her according to LouAnn?

-Kianat Zamir

3 comments » | Discussion Director

« Previous Entries     Next Entries »